↓ Skip to main content

Mass Vaccination: Global Aspects — Progress and Obstacles

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: Mass vaccination: when and why.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Mass vaccination: when and why.
Chapter number 1
Book title
Mass Vaccination: Global Aspects — Progress and Obstacles
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/3-540-36583-4_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-029382-8, 978-3-54-036583-9
Authors

Heymann DL, Aylward RB, D. L. Heymann, R. B. Aylward, Heymann, D. L., Aylward, R. B.

Abstract

With increased demand for smallpox vaccination during the nineteenth century, vaccination days--early mass vaccination campaigns--were conducted over time-limited periods to rapidly and efficiently protect maximum numbers of susceptible persons. Two centuries later, the challenge to rapidly and efficiently protect populations by mass vaccintion continues, despite the strengthening of routine immunization services in many countries through the Expanded Programme on Immunization strategies and GAVI support. Perhaps the most widely accepted reason for mass vaccination is to rapidly increase population (herd) immunity in the setting of an existing or potential outbreak, thereby limiting the morbidity and mortality that might result, especially when there has been no routine vaccination, or because populations have been displaced and routine immunization services disrupted. A second important use of mass vaccination is to accelerate disease control to rapidly increase coverage with a new vaccine at the time of its introduction into routine immunization programmes, and to attain the herd immunity levels required to meet international targets for eradication and mortality reduction. In the twenty-first century, mass vaccination and routine immunization remain a necessary alliance for attaining both national and international goals in the control of vaccine preventable disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Angola 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Kenya 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 51 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,515,005
of 25,301,208 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#88
of 717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,306
of 82,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,301,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.