You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Chapter title |
Breast Cancer Screening: The Debate that Never Ends
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 3 |
Book title |
Optimizing Breast Cancer Management
|
Published in |
Cancer treatment and research, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-70197-4_3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-970195-0, 978-3-31-970197-4
|
Authors |
Sarah M. Friedewald |
Abstract |
Screening mammography has been shown to decrease breast cancer deaths through randomized controlled trials. However, there remains significant debate surrounding the most appropriate time to commence screening and the optimal screening interval. Several national organizations have recently updated their guidelines by reanalyzing the published data. Interestingly, each organization has come to different conclusions regarding their recommendation for breast cancer screening in the average risk woman. Three of the main organizations that issue guidelines for breast cancer screening in the United States are reviewd in this chapter. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 16% |
Researcher | 4 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
Librarian | 2 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 32% |
Engineering | 5 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 6 | 24% |