↓ Skip to main content

A novel mechanical cleavage method for synthesizing few-layer graphenes

Overview of attention for article published in Discover Nano, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 1,146)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A novel mechanical cleavage method for synthesizing few-layer graphenes
Published in
Discover Nano, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1556-276x-6-95
Pubmed ID
Authors

Buddhika Jayasena, Sathyan Subbiah

Abstract

A novel method to synthesize few layer graphene from bulk graphite by mechanical cleavage is presented here. The method involves the use of an ultrasharp single crystal diamond wedge to cleave a highly ordered pyrolytic graphite sample to generate the graphene layers. Cleaving is aided by the use of ultrasonic oscillations along the wedge. Characterization of the obtained layers shows that the process is able to synthesize graphene layers with an area of a few micrometers. Application of oscillation enhances the quality of the layers produced with the layers having a reduced crystallite size as determined from the Raman spectrum. Interesting edge structures are observed that needs further investigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Unknown 328 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 23%
Student > Master 46 14%
Student > Bachelor 39 12%
Researcher 21 6%
Student > Postgraduate 16 5%
Other 37 11%
Unknown 97 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 65 20%
Materials Science 61 18%
Chemistry 38 11%
Physics and Astronomy 32 10%
Chemical Engineering 8 2%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 114 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,121,644
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Discover Nano
#46
of 1,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,441
of 193,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discover Nano
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.