↓ Skip to main content

Plant Programmed Cell Death

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Plant Programmed Cell Death'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Programmed Cell Death in Plants: An Overview
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Investigation of Morphological Features of Autophagy During Plant Programmed Cell Death
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Markers of Developmentally Regulated Programmed Cell Death and Their Analysis in Cereal Seeds
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Measurement of Hypersensitive Cell Death Triggered by Avirulent Bacterial Pathogens in Arabidopsis
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Immunity-Associated Programmed Cell Death as a Tool for the Identification of Genes Essential for Plant Innate Immunity
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Analysis of Mitochondrial Markers of Programmed Cell Death
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Studying Retrograde Signaling in Plants
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 ROS and Cell Death in Tomato Roots Infected by Meloidogyne Incognita
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Detection of Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species (ROS/RNS) During Hypersensitive Cell Death
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 DNA Diffusion Assay Applied to Plant Cells
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Analysis of Reactive Carbonyl Species Generated Under Oxidative Stress
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 In Vivo Analysis of Calcium Levels and Glutathione Redox Status in Arabidopsis Epidermal Leaf Cells Infected with the Hypersensitive Response-Inducing Bacteria Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato AvrB (PstAvrB)
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Measurement of Cyclic GMP During Plant Hypersensitive Disease Resistance Response
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Detection of MAPK3/6 Phosphorylation During Hypersensitive Response (HR)-Associated Programmed Cell Death in Plants
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Measurement of the Caspase-1-Like Activity of Vacuolar Processing Enzyme in Plants
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Plant Cell Cultures as Model Systems to Study Programmed Cell Death
Attention for Chapter 4: Measurement of Hypersensitive Cell Death Triggered by Avirulent Bacterial Pathogens in Arabidopsis
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Measurement of Hypersensitive Cell Death Triggered by Avirulent Bacterial Pathogens in Arabidopsis
Chapter number 4
Book title
Plant Programmed Cell Death
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7668-3_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7667-6, 978-1-4939-7668-3
Authors

Zahra Imanifard, Elodie Vandelle, Diana Bellin

Abstract

The hypersensitive response is one of the most powerful and complex defense reactions to survive to pathogen attacks during an incompatible plant-pathogen interaction. Local programmed cell death accompanies the hypersensitive response at the site of infection to prevent pathogen growth and spread. A precise quantitative assessment of this form of programmed cell death is essential to unravel the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying the process. Here, we first describe the optimization of a Trypan Blue staining protocol for quantitatively measuring the HR-cell death in Arabidopsis. Furthermore, we provide an electrolyte leakage protocol based on pathogen vacuum infiltration, which allows its simultaneous application to a large number of plants as well as to Arabidopsis mutants affected by small size phenotype.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Researcher 3 19%
Other 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Engineering 2 13%
Materials Science 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,807,745
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#952
of 13,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,647
of 443,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#75
of 1,502 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,502 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.