↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrobiologia, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Hydrobiologia, January 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1011879821323
Authors

Makoto Omori, Eiji Nakano

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Unknown 154 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 22%
Student > Master 34 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 15%
Lecturer 7 4%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 13 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 57%
Environmental Science 28 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Chemistry 4 2%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 16 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,589,873
of 19,293,994 outputs
Outputs from Hydrobiologia
#100
of 4,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,545
of 308,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrobiologia
#1
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,293,994 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,292 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.