↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrobiologia, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Summary Blogs Twitter Wikipedia Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Hydrobiologia, January 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1011879821323
Authors

Makoto Omori, Eiji Nakano

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 163 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 22%
Student > Master 36 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 16%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Professor 7 4%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 16 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 53%
Environmental Science 30 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 20 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,103,707
of 23,351,247 outputs
Outputs from Hydrobiologia
#137
of 4,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,599
of 115,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrobiologia
#3
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,351,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,930 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.