↓ Skip to main content

Cadmium: From Toxicity to Essentiality

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: Solid State Structures of Cadmium Complexes with Relevance for Biological Systems
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 134)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Solid State Structures of Cadmium Complexes with Relevance for Biological Systems
Chapter number 7
Book title
Cadmium: From Toxicity to Essentiality
Published in
Metal ions in life sciences, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5179-8_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-075178-1, 978-9-40-075179-8
Authors

Rosa Carballo, Alfonso Castiñeiras, Alicia Domínguez-Martín, Isabel García-Santos, Juan Niclós-Gutiérrez, Carballo, Rosa, Castiñeiras, Alfonso, Domínguez-Martín, Alicia, García-Santos, Isabel, Niclós-Gutiérrez, Juan

Abstract

This chapter provides a review of the literature on structural information from crystal structures determined by X-ray diffractometry of cadmium(II) complexes containing ligands of potential biological interest. These ligands fall into three broad classes, (i) those containing N-donors such as purine or pyrimidine bases and derivatives of adenine, guanine or cytosine, (ii) those containing carboxylate groups such as α-amino acids, in particular the twenty essential ones, the water soluble vitamins (B-complex) or the polycarboxylates of EDTA type ligands, and (iii) S-donors such as thiols/thiolates or dithiocarbamates. A crystal and molecular structural analysis has been carried out for some representative complexes of these ligands, specifically addressing the coordination mode of ligands, the coordination environment of cadmium and, in some significant cases, the intermolecular interactions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 8 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Metal ions in life sciences
#47
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,752
of 400,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metal ions in life sciences
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.