You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
In-Place Algorithms for Computing (Layers of) Maxima
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 34 |
Book title |
Algorithm Theory – SWAT 2006
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/11785293_34 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-54-035753-7, 978-3-54-035755-1
|
Authors |
Henrik Blunck, Jan Vahrenhold |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2011.
All research outputs
#12,879,023
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#3,774
of 8,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,759
of 154,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#84
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.