↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacology and Therapeutics of Asthma and COPD

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 98: Glucocorticoids
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Glucocorticoids
Chapter number 98
Book title
Pharmacology and Therapeutics of Asthma and COPD
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/164_2016_98
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-952173-2, 978-3-31-952175-6
Authors

Ian M. Adcock, Sharon Mumby, Adcock, Ian M., Mumby, Sharon

Abstract

The most effective anti-inflammatory drugs used to treat patients with airways disease are topical glucocorticosteroids (GCs). These act on virtually all cells within the airway to suppress airway inflammation or prevent the recruitment of inflammatory cells into the airway. They also have profound effects on airway structural cells to reverse the effects of disease on their function. Glucorticosteroids act via specific receptors-the glucocorticosteroid receptor (GR)-which are a member of the nuclear receptor family. As such, many of the important actions of GCs are to modulate gene transcription through a number of distinct and complementary mechanisms. Targets genes include most inflammatory mediators such as chemokines, cytokines, growth factors and their receptors. GCs delivered by the inhaled route are very effective for most patients and have few systemic side effects. However, in some patients, even high doses of topical or even systemic GCs fail to control their disease. A number of mechanisms relating to inflammation have been reported to be responsible for the failure of these patients to respond correctly to GCs and these provide insight into GC actions within the airways. In these patients, the side-effect profile of GCs prevent continued use of high doses and new drugs are needed for these patients. Targeting the defective pathways associated with GC function in these patients may also reactivate GC responsiveness.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 166 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 22%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 61 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 71 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,499,299
of 25,352,304 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#261
of 685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,280
of 406,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#25
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,352,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.