↓ Skip to main content

Epiblast Stem Cells

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Epiblast Stem Cells'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Generation and Characterization of Epiblast Stem Cells from Blastocyst-Stage Mouse Embryos
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Reversion of mouse postimplantation epiblast stem cells to a naïve pluripotent state by modulation of signalling pathways.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Converting Mouse Epiblast Stem Cells into Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells by Using Small Molecules
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Isolation and Culture of Rabbit Embryonic Stem Cells
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Goat Embryonic Stem-Like Cell Derivation and Characterization
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Derivation and culture of canine embryonic stem cells.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Isolation and Culture of Porcine Embryonic Stem Cells
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Isolation and Culture of Pig Epiblast Stem Cells
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Epiblast Stem Cells
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Analysis of Molecular Markers for Staging Peri-gastrulating Bovine Embryos
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Chicken Embryonic Stem Cells: Establishment and Characterization
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Manipulating the Avian Epiblast and Epiblast-Derived Stem Cells
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Stepwise differentiation from naïve state pluripotent stem cells to functional primordial germ cells through an epiblast-like state.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Isolation and Culture of Porcine Neural Progenitor Cells from Embryos and Pluripotent Stem Cells
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Derivation of Neural Precursors from Bovine Preimplantation Embryos
Attention for Chapter 13: Stepwise differentiation from naïve state pluripotent stem cells to functional primordial germ cells through an epiblast-like state.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Stepwise differentiation from naïve state pluripotent stem cells to functional primordial germ cells through an epiblast-like state.
Chapter number 13
Book title
Epiblast Stem Cells
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-628-3_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-627-6, 978-1-62703-628-3
Authors

Hayashi K, Saitou M, Katsuhiko Hayashi, Mitinori Saitou, Hayashi, Katsuhiko, Saitou, Mitinori

Abstract

A group of pluripotent cells appearing during mammalian embryogenesis is the source for all the cell lineages that compose the embryo proper. In mice, pluripotent cells are first established in the inner cell mass (ICM) of the preimplantation blastocyst. After implantation, the ICM soon transforms into a cup-shaped epithelium, called the postimplantation epiblast. The two types of pluripotent cells, the ICM and postimplantation epiblast cells, are distinct, based on the differences in their gene expression profiles, epigenetic status, and differentiation capacity. During gastrulation, some of the postimplantation epiblast cells adjacent to the extraembryonic ectoderm are specified as primordial germ cells (PGCs), precursors of the germ cell lineage, in response to bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4). Recently, we succeeded in reconstituting epiblast differentiation and PGC specification in vitro using pluripotent stem cells. Here, we describe the culture method of a stepwise differentiation from pluripotent stem cells to functional PGCs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2015.
All research outputs
#15,314,171
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,319
of 13,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,755
of 200,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#17
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.