You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Lessons from the Murine Models of West Nile Virus Infection
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 6 |
Book title |
West Nile Virus
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3670-0_6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3668-7, 978-1-4939-3670-0
|
Authors |
Brenna McGruder, Vandana Saxena, Tian Wang |
Abstract |
West Nile virus (WNV), a mosquito-borne, single positive-stranded RNA virus, has been the leading cause of arboviral encephalitis in the U.S. and other parts of the world over the past decade. Up to 50 % of WNV convalescent patients were reported to have long-term neurological sequelae or chronic kidney diseases. However, there are neither antiviral drugs nor vaccines available for humans. The underlying mechanism of the long-term sequelae is not clearly understood either. Animal models have been an effective tool to investigate viral pathogenesis and host immunity in humans. Here, we will review several commonly used murine models of WNV infection. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 25% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 31% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 13% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#17,922,331
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,286
of 13,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,932
of 394,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#753
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.