You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
RNA-Guided Genome Editing of Mammalian Cells
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 17 |
| Book title |
Gene Correction
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-761-7_17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-760-0, 978-1-62703-761-7
|
| Authors |
Neena K. Pyzocha, F. Ann Ran, Patrick D. Hsu, Feng Zhang, Pyzocha, Neena K., Ran, F. Ann, Hsu, Patrick D., Zhang, Feng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 191 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 28% |
| Researcher | 42 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 33 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,506,559
of 24,958,301 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,161
of 14,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,379
of 318,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#52
of 567 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,958,301 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,009 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 567 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.