↓ Skip to main content

Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Occipital nerve stimulation.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Occipital nerve stimulation.
Chapter number 2
Book title
Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery
Published in
Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-09066-5_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-909065-8, 978-3-31-909066-5
Authors

Mammis A, Agarwal N, Mogilner AY, Antonios Mammis, Nitin Agarwal, Alon Y. Mogilner

Abstract

Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) is a form of neuromodulation therapy aimed at treating intractable headache and craniofacial pain. The therapy utilizes neurostimulating electrodes placed subcutaneously in the occipital region and connected to a permanently implanted programmable pulse generator identical to those used for dorsal column/spinal cord stimulation. The presumed mechanisms of action involve modulation of the trigeminocervical complex, as well as closure of the physiologic pain gate. ONS is a reversible, nondestructive therapy, which can be tailored to a patient's individual needs. Typically, candidates for successful ONS include those patients with migraines, Chiari malformation, or occipital neuralgia. However, recent MRSA infections, unrealistic expectations, and psychiatric comorbidities are generally contraindications. As with any invasive procedure, complications may occur including lead migration, infection, wound erosion, device failure, muscle spasms, and pain. The success of this therapy is dependent on careful patient selection, a preimplantation trial, meticulous implantation technique, programming strategies, and complication avoidance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 25%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Unknown 12 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2014.
All research outputs
#20,245,139
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery
#13
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,751
of 361,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.