↓ Skip to main content

Emerging and Evolving Topics in Multiple Sclerosis Pathogenesis and Treatments

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 358: Evidence for an Association Between Vitamin D and Multiple Sclerosis.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Evidence for an Association Between Vitamin D and Multiple Sclerosis.
Chapter number 358
Book title
Emerging and Evolving Topics in Multiple Sclerosis Pathogenesis and Treatments
Published in
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/7854_2014_358
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-925541-5, 978-3-31-925543-9
Authors

Julia Pakpoor, Sreeram Ramagopalan, Pakpoor, Julia, Ramagopalan, Sreeram

Abstract

The cause of MSMultiple sclerosis remains unknown, but a number of genetic and environmental risk factors, and their interactions, are thought to contribute to disease risk. A substantial evidence base now exists supporting an association between vitamin D and MS, primarily illustrated by a latitudinal gradient of MS prevalence, a month of birth effect, an interaction of vitamin D with MS-associated genes and the fact that high vitamin D levels have been associated with a reduced MS risk in longitudinal prospective work. The association is primarily based on epidemiological studies which renders the more elusive question of whether this association truly represents causation, or indeed reverse causality in the light of a potentially uncharacterised pro-dromal phase of the disease. The prospect of vitamin DVitamin D supplementation preventing MS is a very attractive notion, but a number of areas of inconsistencies and unanswered questions exist. Most notably, future work will need to establish appropriate dosing, timing and method of vitamin D supplementation in optimising any potential clinical benefit. In this chapter, we discuss the strong epidemiological and growing mechanistic evidence supporting an association between vitamin D and MS, and aim to highlight areas of current debate and where future efforts would be well worth targeting. Given that MS is currently the most common, and a rising, cause of neurological disability in young adults in the Western world, elucidating the relationship between vitamin D and MS is a necessary priority in aiming to further develop therapeutic and preventative strategies against this disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 14 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 16 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2015.
All research outputs
#6,410,071
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#176
of 488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,983
of 354,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#12
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.