↓ Skip to main content

Emerging and Evolving Topics in Multiple Sclerosis Pathogenesis and Treatments

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 361: Helminth Therapy for MS
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Helminth Therapy for MS
Chapter number 361
Book title
Emerging and Evolving Topics in Multiple Sclerosis Pathogenesis and Treatments
Published in
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/7854_2014_361
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-925541-5, 978-3-31-925543-9
Authors

Radu Tanasescu, Cris S. Constantinescu, Tanasescu, Radu, Constantinescu, Cris S.

Abstract

In the last 50 years, environmental factors such as helminth infections have been proposed to explain why autoimmunity is less prevalent in the developing world; this proposal has been termed the hygiene or old friends hypothesis. The epidemiology of MS shows an inverse correlation with helminth infections. Positive effects of helminths in animal models of MS and observational studies in people with MS naturally infected with helminths suggest that those organisms can act as immune regulators and led to clinical trials of helminth therapy. The goal of helminth therapy is to introduce parasitic organisms into people with MS in a controlled and predictable fashion, and to prevent immune-mediated disease without increasing the risk of pathology with high parasite load. This chapter focuses on intestinal worms as they are the current choice as a therapeutic strategy in a number of autoimmune diseases, including MS. Here we review current data regarding the rationale and the current state of research in the field of helminth therapies in MS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,150,335
of 23,302,246 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#309
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,943
of 363,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,302,246 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.