↓ Skip to main content

Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: Neuromodulation in cluster headache.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Neuromodulation in cluster headache.
Chapter number 1
Book title
Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery
Published in
Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-09066-5_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-909065-8, 978-3-31-909066-5
Authors

Fontaine D, Vandersteen C, Magis D, Lanteri-Minet M, Denys Fontaine, Clair Vandersteen, Delphine Magis, Michel Lanteri-Minet, Fontaine, Denys, Vandersteen, Clair, Magis, Delphine, Lanteri-Minet, Michel

Abstract

Medically refractory chronic cluster headache (CH) is a severely disabling headache condition for which several surgical procedures have been proposed as a prophylactic treatment. None of them have been evaluated in controlled conditions, only open studies and case series being available. Destructive procedures (radiofrequency lesioning, radiosurgery, section) and microvascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve or the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) have induced short-term improvement which did not maintain on long term in most of the patients. They carried a high risk of complications, including severe sensory loss and neuropathic pain, and consequently should not be proposed in first intention.Deep brain stimulation (DBS), targeting the presumed CH generator in the retro-hypothalamic region or fibers connecting it, decreased the attack frequency >50 in 60 % of the 52 patients reported. Complications were infrequent: gaze disturbances, autonomic disturbances, and intracranial hemorrhage (2).Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) was efficient (decrease of attack frequency >50 %) in about 70 % of the 60 patients reported, with a low risk of complications (essentially hardware related). Considering their respective risks, ONS should be proposed first and DBS only in case of ONS failure.New on-demand chronically implanted SPG stimulation seemed to be efficient to abort CH attacks in a pilot controlled trial, but its long-term safety needs to be further studied.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 15 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2015.
All research outputs
#13,418,483
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery
#5
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,019
of 361,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 14 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.