↓ Skip to main content

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Systemic Lupus Erythematosus'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Pathology of systemic lupus erythematosus: the challenges ahead.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 The Lupus Biomarker Odyssey: One Experience
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Detection of Antinuclear Antibodies in SLE
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Tests for Circulating Immune Complexes
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Methods for measuring antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Recombinant Antibody Microarray for Profiling the Serum Proteome of SLE
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 TLC Immunostaining for Detection of “Antiphospholipid” Antibodies
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Induced Murine Models of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Measuring Interferon Alpha and Other Cytokines in SLE
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Detection of SLE Antigens in Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs)
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Detection and Characterization of Autoantibodies Against Modified Self-Proteins in SLE Sera After Exposure to Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Generation of Self-Peptides to Treat Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Measurement of Malondialdehyde, Glutathione, and Glutathione Peroxidase in SLE Patients
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Evaluating a Particular Circulating MicroRNA Species from an SLE Patient Using Stem-Loop qRT-PCR
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Microarray Technology for Analysis of MicroRNA Expression in Renal Biopsies of Lupus Nephritis Patients
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Laboratory Tests for the Antiphospholipid Syndrome
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Isolation, Polarization, and Expansion of CD4 + Helper T Cell Lines and Clones Using Magnetic Beads
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Meta-analysis as a Diagnostic Tool for Predicting Disease Onset and/or Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Attention for Chapter 1: Pathology of systemic lupus erythematosus: the challenges ahead.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Pathology of systemic lupus erythematosus: the challenges ahead.
Chapter number 1
Book title
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0326-9_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-0325-2, 978-1-4939-0326-9
Authors

Azevedo PC, Murphy G, Isenberg DA, Pedro Correia Azevedo, Grainne Murphy, David A. Isenberg

Abstract

Many studies have explored the pathology of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), an autoimmune rheumatic disorder with a striking female predominance. Numerous autoimmune phenomena are present in this disease, which ultimately result in organ damage. However, the specific cellular and humoral mechanisms underlying the immune dysfunction are not yet fully understood. It is postulated that autoimmunity is based on the interaction of genetic predisposition, hormonal and environmental triggers that result in reduced tolerance to self-tissues. These phenomena could occur because of altered antigen presentation, abnormalities in B cell responses, increases in the function of T-helper cells, abnormal cytokine production, exaggerated effector responses, or loss of regulatory T cells or B cells. Abnormalities in all of these components of the immune response have been implicated to varying degrees in the pathogenesis of SLE. This chapter will attempt to provide a "state-of-the-art" review of the evidence about the mechanisms underlying the pathology of SLE.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2014.
All research outputs
#20,246,428
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,866
of 13,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,717
of 307,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#435
of 653 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,091 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 653 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.