You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Methods for measuring antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 5 |
| Book title |
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-0326-9_5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-0325-2, 978-1-4939-0326-9
|
| Authors |
Miller AS, Tejada ML, Gazzano-Santoro H, Aaron S. Miller, Max L. Tejada, Hélène Gazzano-Santoro, Miller, Aaron S., Tejada, Max L., Gazzano-Santoro, Hélène |
| Abstract |
Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) is a relevant characteristic to measure for a number of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) under development. ADCC is a mechanism by which antibody-opsonized, infected, or cancerous cells are destroyed by FcγRIII (CD16)-expressing effector cells. Here we describe three methods that can be used to quantify the ADCC activity of mAbs by measuring distinct aspects of the ADCC mechanism. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 27% |
| Researcher | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 33% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,237,640
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,865
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,689
of 307,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#435
of 653 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 653 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.