Chapter title |
Effectiveness of Bronchofiberoscopy in Diagnosis of Lung Lesions
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 6 |
Book title |
Respiratory System Diseases
|
Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/5584_2017_6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-959497-2, 978-3-31-959498-9
|
Authors |
Artur Nahorecki, Katarzyna Postrzech-Adamczyk, Ewelina Straszak, Andrzej Szuba, Dariusz Janczak, Mariusz Chabowski, Nahorecki, Artur, Postrzech-Adamczyk, Katarzyna, Straszak, Ewelina, Szuba, Andrzej, Janczak, Dariusz, Chabowski, Mariusz |
Abstract |
Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths. A short survival rate often results from belated diagnosis made in advanced stages. Therapy individualization requires the collection of a viable material for histopathological examination, which often brings difficulties. This study was performed in a group of 110 patients suspected of malignancy in chest computed tomography. All subjects underwent bronchofiberoscopy. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and endobronchial brushing were performed in all cases, whereas forceps tissue biopsy was taken if mucous membrane abnormalities were observed. In case of a negative result of bronchofiberoscopy invasive methods were implemented. A malignant neoplasm was diagnosed in 106 cases. Overall, cancer cells (positive result) were found in 45 patients (42.0%) subjected to bronchofiberoscopy. Cytology was positive in 38 (35.8%) and histopathological examination in 30 (28.3%) specimens. Eleven samples of BAL (10.3%) were positive. Endobronchial brushing was more effective, with 27 positive samples (25.5%). Forceps tissue biopsy was performed in 33 cases with 90% sensitivity. The most frequent cancer subtype found was squamous cell carcinoma. No severe complications of bronchofiberoscopy were observed. We conclude that bronchofiberosocpy is a safe diagnostic procedure for lung lesions, but its sensitivity and specificity are low. Only when there are mucous macroscopic changes observed, a precise diagnosis is possible. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 15% |
Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 31% |
Materials Science | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 62% |