↓ Skip to main content

Advanced Protocols in Oxidative Stress II

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Advanced Protocols in Oxidative Stress II'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Current Status of Measuring Oxidative Stress
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 pO2 and ROS/RNS Measurements in the Microcirculation in Hypoxia
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Nitrate Reductase Activity of Mitochondrial Aldehyde Dehydrogenase (ALDH-2) as a Redox Sensor for Cardiovascular Oxidative Stress
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Identification of ROS Using Oxidized DCFDA and Flow-Cytometry
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Measurement of 8-Isoprostane in Exhaled Breath Condensate
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Oximetry and Redoximetry
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Measurement of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential and Proton Leak
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Determination of Erythrocyte Fragility as a Marker of Pesticide-Induced Membrane Oxidative Damage
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Using N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine (TMPD) to Assay Cyclooxygenase Activity In Vitro
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Structural and Functional Changes in the Insulin Molecule Produced by Oxidative Stress
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Multiphoton redox ratio imaging for metabolic monitoring in vivo.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Using Fluorescence-Activated Flow Cytometry to Determine Reactive Oxygen Species Formation and Membrane Lipid Peroxidation in Viable Boar Spermatozoa
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Lipofuscin: Detection and Quantification by Microscopic Techniques
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 OXY-SCORE: A Global Index to Improve Evaluation of Oxidative Stress by Combining Pro- and Antioxidant Markers
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Cupric Ion Reducing Antioxidant Capacity Assay for Antioxidants in Human Serum and for Hydroxyl Radical Scavengers
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Analysis of Antioxidant Activities in Vegetable Oils and Fat Soluble Vitamins and Biofactors by the PAO-SO Method
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Measuring antioxidant capacity using the ORAC and TOSC assays.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Assessing the Neuroprotective Effect of Antioxidant Food Factors by Application of Lipid-Derived Dopamine Modification Adducts
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 LIBS-Based Detection of Antioxidant Elements: A New Strategy
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 A Method for Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity Based on Inhibition of Free Radical-Induced Erythrocyte Hemolysis
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Design and Synthesis of Antioxidant α-Lipoic Acid Hybrids
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Characterization of the Antioxidant Properties of Pentaerithrityl Tetranitrate (PETN)-Induction of the Intrinsic Antioxidative System Heme Oxygenase-1 (HO-1)
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Direct Determination of Tissue Aminothiol, Disulfide, and Thioether Levels Using HPLC-ECD with a Novel Stable Boron-Doped Diamond Working Electrode
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Activation of Erythrocyte Plasma Membrane Redox System Provides a Useful Method to Evaluate Antioxidant Potential of Plant Polyphenols
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Antioxidant Activity of Biotransformed Sex Hormones Facilitated by Bacillus Stearothermophilus
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Separation of Phenylpropanoids and Evaluation of Their Antioxidant Activity
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Generation of Antioxidant Adenovirus Gene Transfer Vectors Encoding CuZnSOD, MnSOD, and Catalase
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 HPLC Purification of Adenoviral Vectors
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Mapping of Oxidative Stress Response Elements of the Caveolin-1 Promoter
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Meta-Analysis: Drawing Conclusions When Study Results Vary
Attention for Chapter 17: Measuring antioxidant capacity using the ORAC and TOSC assays.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Measuring antioxidant capacity using the ORAC and TOSC assays.
Chapter number 17
Book title
Advanced Protocols in Oxidative Stress II
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/978-1-60761-411-1_17
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-60761-410-4, 978-1-60761-411-1
Authors

Andrew R. Garrett, Byron K. Murray, Richard A. Robison, Kim L. O’Neill, Garrett, Andrew R., Murray, Byron K., Robison, Richard A., O’Neill, Kim L.

Abstract

Recent epidemiological studies have shown that there may be a link between oxidative stress and the development of several types of chronic diseases. Studies have also shown that diets rich in fruits and vegetables may decrease the incidence of cancer and other chronic diseases. The antioxidant activity of the phytochemicals these foods contain may be partially responsible for the decreased incidence of these diseases in people who regularly consume them. While there are several assays currently used to assess the antioxidant activity of phytochemicals and other antioxidant compounds, two are reviewed here in detail. The first is the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assay, which measures the decrease in fluorescence decay caused by antioxidants, and the second is the total oxyradical scavenging capacity (TOSC) assay, which measures the decrease in ethylene gas production caused by the inhibition of the thermal hydrolysis of ABAP (2,2'-Azobis(2-methyl-(propionamidine) dihydrochloride) by KMBA (alpha-keto-gamma-(methylthio)butyric acid sodium salt) in the presence of antioxidant compounds. These two assays are discussed here, with an in depth review of their methodology and correlation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Researcher 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Chemistry 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 22 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2012.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,316
of 13,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,027
of 179,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#37
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,094 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.