↓ Skip to main content

Strain Variation in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex: Its Role in Biology, Epidemiology and Control

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: The Nature and Evolution of Genomic Diversity in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Nature and Evolution of Genomic Diversity in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex
Chapter number 1
Book title
Strain Variation in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex: Its Role in Biology, Epidemiology and Control
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-64371-7_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-964369-4, 978-3-31-964371-7
Authors

Brites, Daniela, Gagneux, Sebastien, Daniela Brites, Sebastien Gagneux

Abstract

The Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex (MTBC) consists of a clonal group of several mycobacterial lineages pathogenic to a range of different mammalian hosts. In this chapter, we discuss the origins and the evolutionary forces shaping the genomic diversity of the human-adapted MTBC. Advances in whole-genome sequencing have brought invaluable insights into the macro-evolution of the MTBC, and the biogeographical distribution of the different MTBC lineages, the phylogenetic relationships between these lineages. Moreover, micro-evolutionary processes start to be better understood, including those influencing bacterial mutation rates and those governing the fate of new mutations emerging within patients during treatment. Current genomic and epidemiological evidence reflect the fact that, through ecological specialization, the MTBC affecting humans became an obligate and extremely well-adapted human pathogen. Identifying the adaptive traits of human-adapted MTBC and unraveling the bacterial loci that interact with human genomic variation might help identify new targets for developing better vaccines and designing more effective treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 133 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 40 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 3%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 43 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2018.
All research outputs
#17,919,786
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,111
of 4,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,211
of 331,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#18
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.