↓ Skip to main content

Peptides and Peptide-based Biomaterials and their Biomedical Applications

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: Peptide-Based Materials for Cartilage Tissue Regeneration
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Peptide-Based Materials for Cartilage Tissue Regeneration
Chapter number 7
Book title
Peptides and Peptide-based Biomaterials and their Biomedical Applications
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-66095-0_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-966094-3, 978-3-31-966095-0
Authors

Nurcan Hastar, Elif Arslan, Mustafa O. Guler, Ayse B. Tekinay

Abstract

Cartilaginous tissue requires structural and metabolic support after traumatic or chronic injuries because of its limited capacity for regeneration. However, current techniques for cartilage regeneration are either invasive or ineffective for long-term repair. Developing alternative approaches to regenerate cartilage tissue is needed. Therefore, versatile scaffolds formed by biomaterials are promising tools for cartilage regeneration. Bioactive scaffolds further enhance the utility in a broad range of applications including the treatment of major cartilage defects. This chapter provides an overview of cartilage tissue, tissue defects, and the methods used for regeneration, with emphasis on peptide scaffold materials that can be used to supplement or replace current medical treatment options.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Student > Master 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Chemistry 2 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2018.
All research outputs
#16,257,403
of 26,139,724 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,226
of 5,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,795
of 426,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#190
of 495 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,139,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 495 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.