↓ Skip to main content

Quantum Dots: Applications in Biology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Quantum Dots: Applications in Biology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Quantum Dots as Biophotonics Tools
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Photoligation combined with zwitterion-modified lipoic Acid ligands provides compact and biocompatible quantum dots.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Analysis of Quantum Dots and Their Conjugates by Capillary Electrophoresis with Detection of Laser-Induced Luminescence
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Advanced Procedure for Oriented Conjugation of Full-Size Antibodies with Quantum Dots
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Quantum Dot-Antibody Conjugates via Carbodiimide-Mediated Coupling for Cellular Imaging.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Measuring the hydrodynamic radius of quantum dots by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Quantum Dots Fluorescence Quantum Yield Measured by Thermal Lens Spectroscopy
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Semiquantitative Fluorescence Method for Bioconjugation Analysis
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Assembly, Characterization, and Delivery of Quantum Dot Labeled Biotinylated Lipid Particles
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Oriented Conjugation of Single-Domain Antibodies and Quantum Dots
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Functional Integration of Quantum Dot Labeled Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Cardiac Microenvironment
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 In Vitro Approaches to Assessing the Toxicity of Quantum Dots
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Basics for the Preparation of Quantum Dots and Their Interactions with Living Cells
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 In Vivo Approaches to Assessing the Toxicity of Quantum Dots
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Quantum Dots for Imaging Neural Cells In Vitro and In Vivo
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 A Short-Term Inhalation Study Protocol: Designed for Testing of Toxicity and Fate of Nanomaterials
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 A preliminary study of the influence of ions in the pore solution of hardened cement pastes on the porosity determination by low temperature calorimetry
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Solid-Phase Supports for the in situ Assembly of Quantum Dot-FRET Hybridization Assays in Channel Microfluidics
Attention for Chapter 6: Measuring the hydrodynamic radius of quantum dots by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Measuring the hydrodynamic radius of quantum dots by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.
Chapter number 6
Book title
Quantum Dots: Applications in Biology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-1280-3_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-1279-7, 978-1-4939-1280-3
Authors

de Thomaz AA, Almeida DB, Cesar CL, André A. de Thomaz, Diogo B. Almeida, Carlos L. Cesar

Abstract

Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS) is an optical technique that allows the measurement of the diffusion coefficient of molecules in a diluted sample. From the diffusion coefficient it is possible to calculate the hydrodynamic radius of the molecules. For colloidal quantum dots (QDs) the hydrodynamic radius is valuable information to study interactions with other molecules or other QDs. In this chapter we describe the main aspects of the technique and how to use it to calculate the hydrodynamic radius of quantum dots (QDs).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Materials Science 1 17%
Chemistry 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2014.
All research outputs
#18,376,056
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,870
of 13,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,820
of 231,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#33
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,088 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.