↓ Skip to main content

Stem Cell Protocols

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Stem Cell Protocols'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Short Primer in Stem Cell Biology
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Measurement of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Proliferation, Self-Renewal, and Expansion Potential
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Measuring the aging process in stem cells.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Measuring the Potency of a Stem Cell Therapeutic
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Culturing Protocols for Human Multipotent Adult Stem Cells
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Isolation of Murine Bone Marrow Scavenging Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Analysis of Circadian Rhythms in Embryonic Stem Cells
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Measuring stem cell circadian rhythm.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Cryopreservation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: A General Protocol
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Biological Differences Between Native and Cultured Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Implications for Therapies
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 The Use of Multiparameter Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting to Characterize Native Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC)
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 High Yield Recovery of Equine Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Umbilical Cord Matrix/Wharton’s Jelly Using a Semi-automated Process
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Isolation and Functional Assessment of Cutaneous Stem Cells
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Isolation of Adult Stem Cell Populations from the Human Cornea
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Stem Cell Protocols
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Isolation and Characterization of Stem Cells in the Adult Mammalian Ovary
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Stem Cell Protocols
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Culture and characterization of mammary cancer stem cells in mammospheres.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Isolation and Culture of Primary Glioblastoma Cells from Human Tumor Specimens
Attention for Chapter 3: Measuring the aging process in stem cells.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Measuring the aging process in stem cells.
Chapter number 3
Book title
Stem Cell Protocols
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-1785-3_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-1784-6, 978-1-4939-1785-3
Authors

Yi Liu, Gary Van Zant, Ying Liang, Liu, Yi, Van Zant, Gary, Liang, Ying

Abstract

Stem cells persist in replenishing functional mature cells throughout life by self-renewal and multilineage differentiation. Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are among the best-characterized and understood stem cells, and they are responsible for the life-long production of all lineages of blood cells. HSCs are a heterogeneous population containing lymphoid-biased, myeloid-biased, and balanced subsets. HSCs undergo age-associated phenotypic and functional changes, and the composition of the HSC pool alters with aging. HSCs and their lineage-biased subfractions can be identified and analyzed by flow cytometry based on cell surface makers. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) enables the isolation and purification of HSCs that greatly facilitates the mechanistic study of HSCs and their aging process at both cellular and molecular levels. The mouse model has been extensively used in HSC aging study. Bone marrow cells are isolated from young and old mice and stained with fluorescence-conjugated antibodies specific for differentiated and stem cells. HSCs are selected based on the negative expression of lineage markers and positive selection for several sets of stem cell markers. Lineage-biased HSCs can be further distinguished by the level of SLAM/CD150 expression and the extent of Hoechst efflux.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,242,779
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,862
of 13,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,623
of 352,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#635
of 996 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 996 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.