↓ Skip to main content

Gene Therapy for HIV and Chronic Infections

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 9: HIV Latency and the Noncoding RNA Therapeutic Landscape.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
HIV Latency and the Noncoding RNA Therapeutic Landscape.
Chapter number 9
Book title
Gene Therapy for HIV and Chronic Infections
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2432-5_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-2431-8, 978-1-4939-2432-5
Authors

Sheena Saayman, Thomas C Roberts, Kevin V Morris, Marc S Weinberg, Thomas C. Roberts, Kevin V. Morris, Marc S. Weinberg

Abstract

The Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) belongs to the subfamily of lentiviruses that are characterized by long incubation periods and chronic, persistent infection. The virus integrates into the genome of infected CD4+ cells and, in a subpopulation of cells, adopts a transcriptionally silent state, a process referred to a viral latency. This property makes it exceedingly difficult to therapeutically target the virus and eradicate infection. If left untreated, the inexorable demise of the infected individual's immune system ensues, a causal result of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Latently infected cells provide a reservoir that maintains viral infection indefinitely. In this chapter we explore the role of noncoding RNAs in HIV infection and in the establishment and maintenance of viral latency. Both short and long noncoding RNAs are endogenous modulators of epigenetic regulation in human cells and play an active role in gene expression. Lastly, we explore therapeutic modalities based on expressed RNAs that are capable of countering infection, transcriptionally regulating the virus, and suppressing or activating the latent state.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2015.
All research outputs
#17,750,476
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,097
of 4,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,802
of 353,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#155
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.