↓ Skip to main content

Innate DNA and RNA Recognition

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Innate DNA and RNA Recognition'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Detection of RNA modifications by HPLC analysis and competitive ELISA.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Enzymatic Synthesis and Purification of a Defined RIG-I Ligand.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Crystallization of Mouse RIG-I ATPase Domain: In Situ Proteolysis.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Isolation of RIG-I-Associated RNAs from Virus-Infected Cells.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Structure modeling of toll-like receptors.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Nucleic Acid recognition in dendritic cells.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Viral nucleic Acid recognition in human nonimmune cells: in vitro systems.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Analysis of nucleic Acid-induced nonimmune cell death in vitro.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 In vitro analysis of nucleic Acid recognition in B lymphocytes.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Mapping of optimal CD8 T cell epitopes.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 A Modular Approach to Suppression Assays: TLR Ligands, Conditioned Medium, and Viral Infection.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 MicroRNA Methodology: Advances in miRNA Technologies.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Expression Profiling by Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR)
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Evaluating the role of nucleic Acid antigens in murine models of systemic lupus erythematosus.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Induction and analysis of nephrotoxic serum nephritis in mice.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Isolation of Intratumoral Leukocytes of TLR-Stimulated Tumor-Bearing Mice.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Bifunctional siRNAs for Tumor Therapy.
Attention for Chapter 14: Evaluating the role of nucleic Acid antigens in murine models of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Evaluating the role of nucleic Acid antigens in murine models of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Chapter number 14
Book title
Innate DNA and RNA Recognition
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0882-0_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-0881-3, 978-1-4939-0882-0
Authors

Amanda A Watkins, Ramon G B Bonegio, Ian R Rifkin, Amanda A. Watkins, Ramon G. B. Bonegio, Ian R. Rifkin

Editors

Hans-Joachim Anders, Adriana Migliorini

Abstract

Impaired apoptotic cell clearance is thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of systemic autoimmune disease, in particular systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Endogenous RNA- and DNA-containing autoantigens released from dying cells can engage Toll-like receptors (TLR) 7/8 and TLR9, respectively in a number of immune cell types, thereby promoting innate and adaptive immune responses. Mouse models of lupus reliably phenocopy many of the characteristic features of SLE in humans and these models have proved invaluable in defining disease mechanisms. TLR7 signaling is essential for the development of autoantibodies to RNA and RNA-associated proteins like Sm and RNP, while TLR9 signaling is important for the development of antibodies to DNA and chromatin. TLR7 deficiency ameliorates end-organ disease, but, surprisingly, TLR9 deficiency exacerbates disease, possibly as a result of TLR7 overactivity in TLR9-deficient mice. Deficiency of interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) inhibits autoantibody production and ameliorates disease likely due to its role in both TLR7 and TLR9 signaling. In this report we describe methods to analyze two commonly used mouse models of SLE in which TLRs and/or IRF5 have been shown to play a role in disease pathogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Postgraduate 2 20%
Lecturer 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2015.
All research outputs
#18,373,874
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,868
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,290
of 226,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#41
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.