↓ Skip to main content

Electrochemical performance of NixCo1-xMoO4 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) nanowire anodes for lithium-ion batteries

Overview of attention for article published in Discover Nano, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electrochemical performance of NixCo1-xMoO4 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) nanowire anodes for lithium-ion batteries
Published in
Discover Nano, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1556-276x-7-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyung-Soo Park, Seung-Deok Seo, Hyun-Woo Shim, Dong-Wan Kim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 53%
Professor 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 6 35%
Physics and Astronomy 3 18%
Chemistry 2 12%
Mathematics 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Discover Nano
#538
of 1,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,467
of 249,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discover Nano
#19
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.