You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Light, Photoreceptors, and Circadian Clocks
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 1 |
| Book title |
Circadian Rhythms
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-59745-257-1_1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-58829-417-3, 978-1-59745-257-1
|
| Authors |
Russell G. Foster, Mark W. Hankins, Stuart N. Peirson, Foster, Russell G., Hankins, Mark W., Peirson, Stuart N. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 48% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,229,660
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,138
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,701
of 157,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#14
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.