↓ Skip to main content

Biofilm-based Healthcare-associated Infections

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: Microbial biofilm development on neonatal enteral feeding tubes.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Microbial biofilm development on neonatal enteral feeding tubes.
Chapter number 7
Book title
Biofilm-based Healthcare-associated Infections
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-11038-7_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-911037-0, 978-3-31-911038-7
Authors

Noha A Juma, Stephen J Forsythe, Noha A. Juma, Stephen J. Forsythe

Abstract

Neonates in intensive care units often require supporting medical devices and antibiotic treatment. The intensive care treatment combined with their immature immune system, the increased permeability of mucosa, and the undeveloped microflora of the gut may render the neonates highly vulnerable to colonisation and subsequent infections when exposed to opportunistic pathogens. These infections may not only be local gastrointestinal infections, but also systematic following translocation from the gastrointestinal system. This could be particularly alarming considering that common antibiotics may not be effective if the causative strain is multi-drug resistant.This chapter reviews our information on the microbial colonization of neonatal feeding tubes. The range of organisms which have been recovered are wide, and while primarily bacterial, fungi such as Candida have also been found. The bacteria are principally Staphylococcus spp. and Enterobacteriaceae. The Enterobacteriaceae isolates are predominantly Enterobacter cancerogenus, Serratia marcescens, Enterobacter hormaechei, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Many of these isolates encode for antibiotic resistance; E. hormaechei (ceftazidine and cefotaxime) and S. marcescens strains (amoxicillin and co-amoxiclav).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 21 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2015.
All research outputs
#14,789,079
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,257
of 4,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,796
of 352,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#99
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.