↓ Skip to main content

Drug Design and Discovery

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Drug Design and Discovery'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Virtual Screening for Lead Discovery
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Computer-Aided Drug Discovery and Development
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Using Active Site Mapping and Receptor-Based Pharmacophore Tools: Prelude to Docking and De Novo/Fragment-Based Ligand Design
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Methods for Evaluation of Structural and Biological Properties of Antiinvasive Natural Products
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis Using Microwave Irradiation
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Fluorescent and lanthanide labeling for ligand screens, assays, and imaging.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 DNA-Directed Assembly Microarray for Protein and Small Molecule Inhibitor Screening
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Selection of Peptide Ligands for Human Placental Transcytosis Systems Using In Vitro Phage Display
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Optimization of the tetrazolium dye (MTT) colorimetric assay for cellular growth and viability.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Imaging NF-κB Signaling in Mice for Screening Anticancer Drugs
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Evaluation of Anticancer Agents Using Flow Cytometry Analysis of Cancer Stem Cells
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Chemical Screening with Zebrafish Embryos
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 iTRAQ ™ Labeling Coupled with LC-MALDI Mass Spectrometry for Monitoring Temporal Response of Colorectal Cancer Cells to Butyrate Treatment
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Heterotypic Cell Adhesion Assay for the Study of Cell Adhesion Inhibition
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Proteins and Peptides Using a Specific Animal Model for Wound Healing
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 In Vitro Immunogenicity Risk Assessment of Therapeutic Proteins in Preclinical Setting
Attention for Chapter 9: Optimization of the tetrazolium dye (MTT) colorimetric assay for cellular growth and viability.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
321 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Optimization of the tetrazolium dye (MTT) colorimetric assay for cellular growth and viability.
Chapter number 9
Book title
Drug Design and Discovery
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-012-6_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-61779-011-9, 978-1-61779-012-6
Authors

Paul W. Sylvester, Sylvester, Paul W.

Abstract

The MTT colorimetric assay is an established method of determining viable cell number in proliferation and cytotoxicity studies. This assay is based on the cleavage of the yellow tetrazolium salt, MTT, to form a soluble blue formazan product by mitochondrial enzymes, and the amount of formazan produced is directly proportional to the number of living, not dead cells, present during MTT exposure. Since the MTT assay is rapid, convenient, and economical, it has become a very popular technique for quantification of viable cells in culture. However, various parameters have been identified that can affect cellular metabolism and other factors, which significantly modify MTT-specific activity and can result in calculated false high or false low cell counts. Therefore, it is essential to establish assay parameters with the proper controls for each cell line and/or drug treatment in order to optimize assay conditions and minimize confounding effects. These parameters should include determining appropriate cell densities, culture medium, optimal concentrations and exposure times for MTT, fresh culture medium at the time of assay to avoid nutrient depletion, and controlling for drug treatment effects that may influence cellular metabolism. By controlling these important parameters, the MTT colorimetric assay provides accurate and reliable quantification of viable cell number.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 313 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 15%
Student > Bachelor 47 15%
Researcher 29 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 41 13%
Unknown 82 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 11%
Chemistry 33 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 28 9%
Other 26 8%
Unknown 87 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#18,431,471
of 23,671,454 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,524
of 13,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,602
of 184,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#168
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,671,454 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,343 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.