You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Electrochemical Etching Methods for Producing Porous Silicon
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 1 |
| Book title |
Electrochemically Engineered Nanoporous Materials
|
| Published in |
ADS, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-20346-1_1 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-920345-4, 978-3-31-920346-1
|
| Authors |
Abel Santos, Tushar Kumeria, Santos, Abel, Kumeria, Tushar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 14 | 30% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 15% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,826,615
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#4,634
of 37,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,546
of 355,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#75
of 496 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,759 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 496 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.