↓ Skip to main content

Lung Cancer

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 14: Small Cell Lung Cancer
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 194)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Small Cell Lung Cancer
Chapter number 14
Book title
Lung Cancer
Published in
Cancer treatment and research, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-40389-2_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-940387-8, 978-3-31-940389-2
Authors

Erica B. Bernhardt, Shadia I. Jalal, Bernhardt, Erica B., Jalal, Shadia I.

Abstract

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive cancer of neuroendocrine origin, which is strongly associated with cigarette smoking. Patients typically present with a short duration of symptoms and frequently (60-65 %) with metastatic disease. SCLC is a heterogeneous disease including extremely chemosensitive and chemoresistant clones. For this reason, a high percentage of patients respond to first-line chemotherapy but rapidly succumb to the disease. SCLC is generally divided into two stages, limited and extensive. Standard treatment of limited stage disease includes combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide for four cycles, thoracic radiation initiated early with the first cycle of chemotherapy, and consideration of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in the subset of patients with good response. Surgery may play a role in TNM stages I and II. In extensive disease, platinum agents and etoposide, used in combination, are again the first-line standard of care in the USA. However, thoracic radiation therapy is used predominately in patients where local control is important and PCI is of uncertain benefit. Despite these treatments, prognosis remains poor and novel therapies are needed to improve survival in this disease.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 188 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Other 17 9%
Researcher 14 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 73 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 76 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cancer treatment and research
#44
of 194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,719
of 405,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer treatment and research
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.