↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

GeNeDis 2014

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'GeNeDis 2014'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Optoacoustics as a Bioengineering Model for Neuroscience Discovery
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Respiratory Particle Deposition Probability Due to Sedimentation with Variable Gravity and Electrostatic Forces
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Sequence patterns mediating functions of disordered proteins.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Management and Modeling of Balance Disorders Using Decision Support Systems: The EMBALANCE Project
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 A computer-aided diagnosis system for geriatrics assessment and frailty evaluation.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Exploiting expert systems in cardiology: a comparative study.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Modeling protein misfolding in charcot-marie-tooth disease.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 The Effect of the Shape and Size of Gold Seeds Irradiated with Ultrasound on the Bio-Heat Transfer in Tissue
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Clinical Decision Support System for the Diagnosis of Adolescence Health
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Mitochondrial Fusion Through Membrane Automata
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 A Mathematical Model for the Blood Plasma Flow Around Two Aggregated Low-Density Lipoproteins
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Translation of Two Aggregated Low-Density Lipoproteins Within Blood Plasma: A Mathematical Model
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Chaotic Attractors in Tumor Growth and Decay: A Differential Equation Model
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Modeling k -Noncrossing Closed RNA Secondary Structures via Meandric Compression
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Exploring the Online Satisfaction Gap of Medical Doctors: An Expectation-Confirmation Investigation of Information Needs
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 A Cloud-Based Data Network Approach for Translational Cancer Research
Attention for Chapter 5: A computer-aided diagnosis system for geriatrics assessment and frailty evaluation.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Summary X Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A computer-aided diagnosis system for geriatrics assessment and frailty evaluation.
Chapter number 5
Book title
GeNeDis 2014
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-09012-2_5
Pubmed ID
25417017
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-909011-5, 978-3-31-909012-2
Authors

Vairaktarakis C, Tsiamis V, Soursou G, Lekkas F, Nikolopoulou M, Vasileiadou E, Premtsis K, Alexiou A, Charalampos Vairaktarakis, Vasilis Tsiamis, Georgia Soursou, Filippos Lekkas, Markella Nikolopoulou, Emmanouilia Vasileiadou, Konstantinos Premtsis, Athanasios Alexiou, Vairaktarakis, Charalampos, Tsiamis, Vasilis, Soursou, Georgia, Lekkas, Filippos, Nikolopoulou, Markella, Vasileiadou, Emmanouilia, Premtsis, Konstantinos, Alexiou, Athanasios

Abstract

It is a common knowledge that frailty is a condition associated with getting older, and it has been considered as highly prevalent as far as falls, disability, hospitalization, and mortality are concerned. At the present time a standardized definition has not yet been established. With that in mind and for frailty being of a vital importance as a term identifying geriatric symptoms, we pursued to embody the well-known 70-scale CSHA Frailty index of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging in a Clinical Decision Support System, after categorizing and expanding it. The proposed categorization in this chapter can be helpful for usage by patients and their relatives, care givers, and medical doctors.

View on publisher site
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
 Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 25%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Engineering 5 14%
Computer Science 4 11%
Psychology 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,245,139
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,956
of 4,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,102
of 361,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#227
of 323 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 323 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.