↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary Disorders and Therapy

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 73: Oleic Derivatives of Dopamine and Respiration
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Oleic Derivatives of Dopamine and Respiration
Chapter number 73
Book title
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/5584_2017_73
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-973702-7, 978-3-31-973703-4
Authors

Zajac, Dominika, Stasinska, Agnieszka, Pokorski, Mieczyslaw, Dominika Zajac, Agnieszka Stasinska, Mieczyslaw Pokorski

Abstract

Ventilatory inhibition is considered an undesirable pharmacological side effect of pharmacotherapy in neurodegenerative conditions underlain by brain dopamine deficiency. In this context, oleic derivatives of dopamine or N-acyl-dopamines are novel substances that may be of high therapeutic interest as having the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier and acting in dopamine-like manner. In the present study we seek to define the influence of N-acyl-dopamines on lung ventilation and its hypoxic responses in the rat. We found that N-oleoyl-dopamine decreased both normoxic and peak hypoxic ventilation in response to 8% acute hypoxia, on average, by 31% and 41%, respectively. Its metabolite, 3'-O-methyl-N-oleoyl-dopamine, caused a 15% ventilatory decrease each, whereas an oleic ester derivative, 3'-O-oleoyl-N-oleoyl-dopamine, caused 11% and 19% ventilatory decreases, respectively. All three N-acyl-dopamines investigated displayed an inhibitory effect on ventilation. The findings indicate that 3'-O-methyl-N-oleoyl-dopamine and 3'-O-oleoyl-N-oleoyl-dopamine performed better than N-oleoyl-dopamine in term of less ventilatory suppression, albeit the differences among the three compounds were modest. We conclude that N-acyl-dopamines are worthy of intensified explorations as potential carriers of dopamine molecule in view of the lack of clinically effective methods of dopamine delivery into the brain in neurodegenerative conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Sports and Recreations 1 17%
Neuroscience 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,433,667
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,984
of 4,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,391
of 313,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#64
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.