↓ Skip to main content

The Immunology of Cardiovascular Homeostasis and Pathology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 12: The Innate Immune Response in Myocardial Infarction, Repair, and Regeneration
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Innate Immune Response in Myocardial Infarction, Repair, and Regeneration
Chapter number 12
Book title
The Immunology of Cardiovascular Homeostasis and Pathology
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-57613-8_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-957611-4, 978-3-31-957613-8
Authors

Gentek, Rebecca, Hoeffel, Guillaume, Rebecca Gentek, Guillaume Hoeffel

Abstract

Following myocardial infarction (MI), resident innate immune cells such as macrophages, innate lymphoid cells, and mast cells rapidly coordinate their function to contain inflammation by removing dying cells and promoting cardiomyocyte replenishment. To sustain local tissue repair functions, hematopoietic progenitors are mobilized from the bone marrow to the spleen to generate subsequent myeloid cells such as monocytes and neutrophils, which are rapidly recruited at the site of MI. A finely tuned balance between local adaptation and recruitment controls the overall outcome of the cardiac tissue regeneration versus repair and scar formation.In this chapter, the (potential) roles of the innate immune system residing in the heart are discussed in the context of recent findings about macrophage ontogeny and their homeostasis with circulating monocytes during cardiac tissue growth and after myocardial infarction. Their interactions with other members of the innate immune system are also discussed with a particular emphasis on the potential involvement of mast cells and innate lymphoid cells during MI, largely underestimated until recently. Understanding the development and the functions of the different protagonists responding to MI as well as their potential cross talk could help design new strategies for regenerative medicine intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Master 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 15 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 16 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2017.
All research outputs
#15,866,607
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,579
of 5,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,760
of 311,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#60
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.