↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary Infection

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 123: Progress in the Diagnosis and Control of Ebola Disease.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Progress in the Diagnosis and Control of Ebola Disease.
Chapter number 123
Book title
Pulmonary Infection
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/5584_2015_123
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-917457-0, 978-3-31-917458-7
Authors

Agnieszka Woźniak-Kosek, Jarosław Kosek, Jerzy Mierzejewski, Piotr Rapiejko, Woźniak-Kosek, Agnieszka, Kosek, Jarosław, Mierzejewski, Jerzy, Rapiejko, Piotr

Editors

Mieczyslaw Pokorski

Abstract

Ebola hemorrhagic fever is one of numerous viral hemorrhagic fevers. It is a severe, often fatal disease in humans and nonhuman primates (gorillas and chimpanzees). This article discusses the history of Ebola disease, already known routes of infection together with defining prevention methods and treatment trials. The importance of increasing awareness of the risk of disease among people who do not inhabit endemic regions is emphasized. This risk is associated especially with the increasing popularity of tourism to African countries, even to those where the virus is endemic. The research conducted over the years shows that three species of frugivorous bats are subjected to contamination by Ebola, but the infection is asymptomatic in them. It is believed that the saliva of these mammals and other body fluids may be a potential source of infection for primates and humans. In the laboratory, infection through small-particle aerosols has been demonstrated in primates, and airborne spread among humans is strongly suspected, although it has not yet been conclusively demonstrated. The importance of this route of transmission remains unclear. Poor hygienic conditions can aid the spread of the virus. These observations suggest approaches to the study of routes of transmission to and among humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Kenya 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Other 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 5 10%
Librarian 3 6%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2022.
All research outputs
#18,298,828
of 23,500,709 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,184
of 5,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,888
of 257,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,500,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.