↓ Skip to main content

Proteogenomics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: Identification of Small Novel Coding Sequences, a Proteogenomics Endeavor
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Identification of Small Novel Coding Sequences, a Proteogenomics Endeavor
Chapter number 4
Book title
Proteogenomics
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-42316-6_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-942314-2, 978-3-31-942316-6
Authors

Volodimir Olexiouk, Gerben Menschaert, Olexiouk, Volodimir, Menschaert, Gerben

Abstract

The identification of small proteins and peptides has consistently proven to be challenging. However, technological advances as well as multi-omics endeavors facilitate the identification of novel small coding sequences, leading to new insights. Specifically, the application of next generation sequencing technologies (NGS), providing accurate and sample specific transcriptome / translatome information, into the proteomics field led to more comprehensive results and new discoveries. This book chapter focuses on the inclusion of RNA-Seq and RIBO-Seq also known as ribosome profiling, an RNA-Seq based technique sequencing the +/- 30 bp long fragments captured by translating ribosomes. We emphasize the identification of micropeptides and neo-antigens, two distinct classes of small translation products, triggering our current understanding of biology. RNA-Seq is capable of capturing sample specific genomic variations, enabling focused neo-antigen identification. RIBO-Seq can identify translation events in small open reading frames which are considered to be non-coding, leading to the discovery of micropeptides. The identification of small translation products requires the integration of multi-omics data, stressing the importance of proteogenomics in this novel research area.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Other 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2016.
All research outputs
#15,512,676
of 23,054,359 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,522
of 4,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,299
of 394,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#222
of 445 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,054,359 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 445 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.