↓ Skip to main content

Nanotechniques Inactivate Cancer Stem Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Discover Nano, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanotechniques Inactivate Cancer Stem Cells
Published in
Discover Nano, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s11671-017-2175-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anatoliy N. Goltsev, Natalya N. Babenko, Yulia A. Gaevskaya, Nikolay A. Bondarovich, Tatiana G. Dubrava, Maksim V. Ostankov, Olga V. Chelombitko, Yuriy V. Malyukin, Vladimir K. Klochkov, Nataliya S. Kavok

Abstract

One of the tasks of current oncology is identification of cancer stem cells and search of therapeutic means capable of their specific inhibition. The paper presents the data on phenotype characteristics of Ehrlich carcinoma cells as convenient and easy-to-follow model of tumor growth. The evidence of cancer stem cells as a part of Ehrlich carcinoma and significance of CD44(+) and CD44(-) subpopulations in maintaining the growth of this type of tumor were demonstrated. A high (tenfold) tumorigenic activity of the Ehrlich carcinoma CD44(+) cells if compared to CD44(-) cells was proven. In this pair of comparison, the CD44(+) cells had a higher potential of generating in peritoneal cavity of CD44(high), CD44(+)CD24(-), CD44(+)CD24(+) cell subpopulations, highlighting the presence of cancer stem cells in a pool of CD44(+) cells.In this study, the ability of synthesized hybrid nanocomplexes, comprising the nanoparticles of rare earth orthovanadates GdYVO4:Eu(3+) and cholesterol to inhibit the tumor growth and to increase the survival of the animals with tumors was established. A special contribution into tumor-inhibiting effect is made by each of its components. Treatment of Ehrlich carcinoma cells with two-component hybrid complex resulted in maximum reduction in the concentration of the most tumorigenic CD44(high) cells with simultaneous rise in the number of CD117(+) cells that decreased an intensity of tumor growth by 74.70 ± 4.38% if compared with the control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Unspecified 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Physics and Astronomy 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Discover Nano
#802
of 1,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,704
of 331,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discover Nano
#20
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.