You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Incidence and recurrence of large forest fires in mainland Portugal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-016-2474-y |
| Authors |
F. Ferreira-Leite, A. Bento-Gonçalves, A. Vieira, A. Nunes, L. Lourenço |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 20% |
| Researcher | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 20 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,714,402
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#131
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,117
of 365,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#4
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.