↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral Neurobiology of Depression and Its Treatment

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 216: Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Antidepressant Action.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Antidepressant Action.
Chapter number 216
Book title
Behavioral Neurobiology of Depression and Its Treatment
Published in
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/7854_2012_216
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-235424-3, 978-3-64-235425-0
Authors

Trevor Sharp

Editors

Philip J. Cowen, Trevor Sharp, Jennifer Y. F. Lau

Abstract

A long-standing theory is that brain monoamine signalling is critically involved in the mechanisms of antidepressant drug treatment. Theories on the nature of these mechanisms commenced with ideas developed in the 1960s that the drugs act simply by increasing monoamine availability in the synapse. However, this thinking has advanced remarkably in the last decade to concepts which position that antidepressant drug action on monoamine signalling is just the starting point for a complex sequence of neuroadaptive molecular and cellular changes that bring about the therapeutic effect. These changes include activation of one or more programmes of gene expression that leads to the strengthening of synaptic efficacy and connectivity, and even switching neural networks into a more immature developmental state. It is thought that through this increase in plasticity, key neural circuits within the limbic system are more easily remodelled by incoming emotionally relevant stimuli. This article attempts to bring together previous and current knowledge of antidepressant drug action on monoamine signalling at molecular and cellular levels, and introduces current thinking that these changes interact with neuropsychological processes ultimately to elevate mood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 21%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Postgraduate 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 23%
Neuroscience 15 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Psychology 8 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 29 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2012.
All research outputs
#20,163,398
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#436
of 486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,060
of 165,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.