↓ Skip to main content

Heterologous Expression of Membrane Proteins

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Heterologous Expression of Membrane Proteins'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Heterologous Expression of Membrane Proteins for Structural Analysis
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Production of Membrane Proteins in Escherichia coli and Lactococcus lactis
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Mammalian Membrane Receptors Expression as Inclusion Bodies in Escherichia coli
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Expression of Membrane Proteins at the Escherichia coli Membrane for Structural Studies
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Membrane Protein Expression in Lactococcus lactis
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Heterologous Expression of Human Membrane Receptors in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Mammalian Membrane Protein Expression in Baculovirus-Infected Insect Cells
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Expression of Membrane Proteins in Drosophila Melanogaster S2 Cells: Production and Analysis of a EGFP-Fused G Protein-Coupled Receptor as a Model
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Membrane Protein Expression in the Eyes of Transgenic Flies
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Expression of Mammalian Membrane Proteins in Mammalian Cells Using Semliki Forest Virus Vectors
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Membrane Protein Expression in Cell-Free Systems
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Practical Considerations of Membrane Protein Instability during Purification and Crystallisation
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Membrane Protein Solubilization
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Amphipols and Fluorinated Surfactants: Two Alternatives to Detergents for Studying Membrane Proteins In vitro
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Heterologous Expression and Affinity Purification of Eukaryotic Membrane Proteins in View of Functional and Structural Studies: The Example of the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ca 2+ -ATPase
Attention for Chapter 4: Expression of Membrane Proteins at the Escherichia coli Membrane for Structural Studies
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Expression of Membrane Proteins at the Escherichia coli Membrane for Structural Studies
Chapter number 4
Book title
Heterologous Expression of Membrane Proteins
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/978-1-60761-344-2_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-60761-343-5, 978-1-60761-344-2
Authors

Manuela Zoonens, Bruno Miroux, Zoonens, Manuela, Miroux, Bruno

Abstract

Structural biology of membrane proteins is often limited by the first steps in obtaining sufficient yields of proteins because native sources are seldom. Heterologous systems like bacteria are then commonly employed for membrane protein over-expression. Escherichia coli is the main bacterial host used. However, overproduction of a foreign membrane protein at a non-physiological level is usually toxic for cells or leads to inclusion body formation. Those effects can be reduced by optimizing the cell growth conditions, choosing the suitable bacterial strain and expression vector, and finally co-expressing the target protein and the b-subunit of E. coli adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-synthase, which triggers the proliferation of intracytoplasmic membranes. This chapter is devoted to help the experimenter in choosing the appropriate plasmid/bacterial host combination for optimizing the amount of the target membrane protein produced in its correct folded state.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 71 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 30%
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Professor 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 21%
Chemistry 12 16%
Engineering 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2014.
All research outputs
#20,217,843
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,853
of 13,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,786
of 163,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#108
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,087 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.