↓ Skip to main content

Vertebrate Myogenesis

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: Recruitment of Skeletal Muscle Progenitors to Secondary Sites: A Role for CXCR4/SDF-1 Signalling in Skeletal Muscle Development.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Recruitment of Skeletal Muscle Progenitors to Secondary Sites: A Role for CXCR4/SDF-1 Signalling in Skeletal Muscle Development.
Chapter number 1
Book title
Vertebrate Myogenesis
Published in
Results and problems in cell differentiation, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-44608-9_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-66-244607-2, 978-3-66-244608-9
Authors

Masyuk M, Brand-Saberi B, Maryna Masyuk, Beate Brand-Saberi

Editors

Beate Brand-Saberi

Abstract

During embryonic development, myogenesis occurs in different functional muscle groups at different time points depending on the availability of their final destinations. Primary trunk muscle consists of the intrinsic dorsal (M. erector spinae) and ventral (cervical, thoracic, abdominal) muscles. In contrast, secondary trunk muscles are established from progenitor cells that have migrated initially from the somites into the limb buds and thereafter returned to the trunk. Furthermore, craniofacial muscle constitutes a group that originates from four different sources and employs a different set of regulatory molecules. Development of muscle groups at a distance from their origins involves the maintenance of a pool of progenitor cells capable of proliferation and directed cell migration. We review here the data concerning somite-derived progenitor cell migration to the limbs and subsequent retrograde migration in the establishment of secondary trunk muscle in chicken and mouse. We review the function of SDF-1 and CXCR4 in the control of this process referring to our previous work in shoulder muscle and cloacal/perineal muscle development. Some human anatomical variations and malformations of secondary trunk muscles are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Other 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,264,045
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Results and problems in cell differentiation
#163
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,193
of 260,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Results and problems in cell differentiation
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.