You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Great Canoes in the Sky
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
ADS, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-22623-1 |
| ISBNs |
978-3-31-922622-4, 978-3-31-922623-1
|
| Authors |
Chadwick, Stephen Robert, Paviour-Smith, Martin, Stephen Robert Chadwick, Martin Paviour-Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 33% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,528,244
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#9,298
of 37,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,572
of 421,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#187
of 1,889 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,415 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,889 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.