↓ Skip to main content

Protein Function Prediction

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Protein Function Prediction'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Using PFP and ESG Protein Function Prediction Web Servers
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 GHOSTX: A Fast Sequence Homology Search Tool for Functional Annotation of Metagenomic Data
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 From Gene Annotation to Function Prediction for Metagenomics
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 An Agile Functional Analysis of Metagenomic Data Using SUPER-FOCUS
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 MPFit: Computational Tool for Predicting Moonlighting Proteins
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Predicting Secretory Proteins with SignalP
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 The ProFunc Function Prediction Server
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 G-LoSA for Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Sites and Structures
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Local Alignment of Ligand Binding Sites in Proteins for Polypharmacology and Drug Repositioning
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 WATsite2.0 with PyMOL Plugin: Hydration Site Prediction and Visualization
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Enzyme Annotation and Metabolic Reconstruction Using KEGG
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Ortholog Identification and Comparative Analysis of Microbial Genomes Using MBGD and RECOG
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Exploring Protein Function Using the Saccharomyces Genome Database
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Network-Based Gene Function Prediction in Mouse and Other Model Vertebrates Using MouseNet Server
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The FANTOM5 Computation Ecosystem: Genomic Information Hub for Promoters and Active Enhancers
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Multi-Algorithm Particle Simulations with Spatiocyte
Attention for Chapter 3: From Gene Annotation to Function Prediction for Metagenomics
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
From Gene Annotation to Function Prediction for Metagenomics
Chapter number 3
Book title
Protein Function Prediction
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7015-5_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7013-1, 978-1-4939-7015-5, 978-1-4939-7013-1, 978-1-4939-7015-5
Authors

Fatemeh Sharifi, Yuzhen Ye

Editors

Daisuke Kihara

Abstract

Microbes play important roles in almost every aspect of life, including human health and diseases. Facilitated by the rapid development of sequencing technologies, metagenomics research has accelerated the accumulation of genomic sequences of microbial species that had been inaccessible before. Analysis of the metagenomic sequencing data can reveal not only the species but also the functional composition of microbial communities. Here, we report a pipeline for functional annotation of metagenomic datasets. The pipeline is built from several programs that we have developed for metagenomic sequence analysis including a protein-coding gene predictor for short reads (or contigs) and a fast similarity search tool. Given a metagenomic dataset, the pipeline reports putative protein-coding genes (or gene fragments) and functional annotations of the genes in Gene Ontology (GO) terms and Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers, and potential metabolic pathways that are likely encoded by the metagenome. Fun4Me is available for download at https://sourceforge.net/projects/fun4me .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Estonia 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 22%
Computer Science 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,890,321
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#532
of 13,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,562
of 315,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#9
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,981 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.