Chapter title |
Ecological Epigenetics
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 10 |
Book title |
Ecological Genomics
|
Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-94-007-7347-9_10 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-9-40-077346-2, 978-9-40-077347-9
|
Authors |
Holly J. Kilvitis, Mariano Alvarez, Christy M. Foust, Aaron W. Schrey, Marta Robertson, Christina L. Richards, Kilvitis, Holly J., Alvarez, Mariano, Foust, Christy M., Schrey, Aaron W., Robertson, Marta, Richards, Christina L. |
Abstract |
Biologists have assumed that heritable variation due to DNA sequence differences (i.e., genetic variation) allows populations of organisms to be both robust and adaptable to extreme environmental conditions. Natural selection acts on the variation among different genotypes and ultimately changes the genetic composition of the population. While there is compelling evidence about the importance of genetic polymorphisms, evidence is accumulating that epigenetic mechanisms (e.g., chromatin modifications, DNA methylation) can affect ecologically important traits, even in the absence of genetic variation. In this chapter, we review this evidence and discuss the consequences of epigenetic variation in natural populations. We begin by defining the term epigenetics, providing a brief overview of various epigenetic mechanisms, and noting the potential importance of epigenetics in the study of ecology. We continue with a review of the ecological epigenetics literature to demonstrate what is currently known about the amount and distribution of epigenetic variation in natural populations. Then, we consider the various ecological contexts in which epigenetics has proven particularly insightful and discuss the potential evolutionary consequences of epigenetic variation. Finally, we conclude with suggestions for future directions of ecological epigenetics research. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 38 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 18% |
Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 46% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 21% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 15% |