↓ Skip to main content

Research in Computational Molecular Biology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Research in Computational Molecular Biology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Boosting Alignment Accuracy by Adaptive Local Realignment
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 A Concurrent Subtractive Assembly Approach for Identification of Disease Associated Sub-metagenomes
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 A Flow Procedure for the Linearization of Genome Sequence Graphs
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Dynamic Alignment-Free and Reference-Free Read Compression
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 A Fast Approximate Algorithm for Mapping Long Reads to Large Reference Databases
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Determining the Consistency of Resolved Triplets and Fan Triplets
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Progressive Calibration and Averaging for Tandem Mass Spectrometry Statistical Confidence Estimation: Why Settle for a Single Decoy?
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Resolving Multicopy Duplications de novo Using Polyploid Phasing
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 A Bayesian Active Learning Experimental Design for Inferring Signaling Networks
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 $$BBK^*$$ (Branch and Bound over $$K^*$$ ): A Provable and Efficient Ensemble-Based Algorithm to Optimize Stability and Binding Affinity over Large Sequence Spaces
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Superbubbles, Ultrabubbles and Cacti
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 EPR-Dictionaries: A Practical and Fast Data Structure for Constant Time Searches in Unidirectional and Bidirectional FM Indices
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 A Bayesian Framework for Estimating Cell Type Composition from DNA Methylation Without the Need for Methylation Reference
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Towards Recovering Allele-Specific Cancer Genome Graphs
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Using Stochastic Approximation Techniques to Efficiently Construct Confidence Intervals for Heritability
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Improved Search of Large Transcriptomic Sequencing Databases Using Split Sequence Bloom Trees
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 AllSome Sequence Bloom Trees
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Longitudinal Genotype-Phenotype Association Study via Temporal Structure Auto-learning Predictive Model
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Improving Imputation Accuracy by Inferring Causal Variants in Genetic Studies
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 The Copy-Number Tree Mixture Deconvolution Problem and Applications to Multi-sample Bulk Sequencing Tumor Data
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Quantifying the Impact of Non-coding Variants on Transcription Factor-DNA Binding
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 aBayesQR: A Bayesian Method for Reconstruction of Viral Populations Characterized by Low Diversity
Attention for Chapter 2: A Concurrent Subtractive Assembly Approach for Identification of Disease Associated Sub-metagenomes
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Concurrent Subtractive Assembly Approach for Identification of Disease Associated Sub-metagenomes
Chapter number 2
Book title
Research in Computational Molecular Biology
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56970-3_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-956969-7, 978-3-31-956970-3
Authors

Wontack Han, Mingjie Wang, Yuzhen Ye

Abstract

Comparative analysis of metagenomes can be used to detect sub-metagenomes (species or gene sets) that are associated with specific phenotypes (e.g., host status). The typical workflow is to assemble and annotate metagenomic datasets individually or as a whole, followed by statistical tests to identify differentially abundant species/genes. We previously developed subtractive assembly (SA), a de novo assembly approach for comparative metagenomics that first detects differential reads that distinguish between two groups of metagenomes and then only assembles these reads. Application of SA to type 2 diabetes (T2D) microbiomes revealed new microbial genes associated with T2D. Here we further developed a Concurrent Subtractive Assembly (CoSA) approach, which uses a Wilcoxon rank-sum (WRS) test to detect k-mers that are differentially abundant between two groups of microbiomes (by contrast, SA only checks ratios of k-mer counts in one pooled sample versus the other). It then uses identified differential k-mers to extract reads that are likely sequenced from the sub-metagenome with consistent abundance differences between the groups of microbiomes. Further, CoSA attempts to reduce the redundancy of reads (from abundant common species) by excluding reads containing abundant k-mers. Using simulated microbiome datasets and T2D datasets, we show that CoSA achieves strikingly better performance in detecting consistent changes than SA does, and it enables the detection and assembly of genomes and genes with minor abundance difference. A SVM classifier built upon the microbial genes detected by CoSA from the T2D datasets can accurately discriminates patients from healthy controls, with an AUC of 0.94 (10-fold cross-validation), and therefore these differential genes (207 genes) may serve as potential microbial marker genes for T2D.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Computer Science 3 13%
Chemistry 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#3,997,455
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#854
of 8,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,321
of 315,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#5
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.