You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-Wide Association Studies and Genomic Prediction
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-447-0 |
| ISBNs |
978-1-62703-446-3, 978-1-62703-447-0, 978-1-4939-5964-8
|
| Editors |
Cedric Gondro, Julius van der Werf, Ben Hayes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 966 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 11 | 1% |
| United States | 8 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 925 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 240 | 25% |
| Researcher | 172 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 135 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 78 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 71 | 7% |
| Other | 122 | 13% |
| Unknown | 148 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 479 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 135 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 27 | 3% |
| Psychology | 13 | 1% |
| Other | 90 | 9% |
| Unknown | 179 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,011,773
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#273
of 14,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,402
of 295,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#12
of 351 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 351 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.