↓ Skip to main content

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Protocols

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Protocols'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Clinical, Epidemiologic, and Laboratory Aspects of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Case Studies.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Rapid methods for detection of MRSA in clinical specimens.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Immunofluorescence Microscopy for the Detection of Surface Antigens in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS)-PCR Identification of MRSA.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Typing of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) of Staphylococcus aureus
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec (SCCmec) Analysis of MRSA.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Genetic Interruption of Target Genes for Investigation of Virulence Factors
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Molecular Analysis of Staphylococcal Superantigens
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Investigation of Staphylococcus aureus Adhesion and Invasion of Host Cells
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Investigation of Biofilm Formation in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Transcriptomic Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus Using Microarray and Advanced Next-Generation RNA-seq Technologies.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Proteomic Approach to Investigate Pathogenicity and Metabolism of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Metabolomic Investigation of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Treatment of Infections Due to Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Anti-infective Drug Development for MRSA.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Animal Models in Drug Development for MRSA.
Attention for Chapter 1: Clinical, Epidemiologic, and Laboratory Aspects of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Clinical, Epidemiologic, and Laboratory Aspects of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections.
Chapter number 1
Book title
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Protocols
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-664-1_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-663-4, 978-1-62703-664-1
Authors

Elizabeth L Palavecino, Elizabeth L. Palavecino, Palavecino, Elizabeth L.

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major pathogen responsible for both hospital and community onset disease. Resistance to methicillin in S. aureus is mediated by PBP2a, a penicillin-binding protein with low affinity to beta-lactams, encoded by the mecA gene. Accurate susceptibility testing of S. aureus isolates and screening of patients for colonization with MRSA are important tools to limit the spread of this organism. This review focuses on the clinical significance of MRSA infections and new approaches for the laboratory diagnosis and epidemiologic typing of MRSA strains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 12 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2013.
All research outputs
#13,898,428
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,906
of 13,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,109
of 305,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#157
of 594 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,085 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 594 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.