You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Reverse line blot hybridization with species-specific oligonucleotide probes: application to piroplasm detection.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 14 |
Book title |
Veterinary Infection Biology: Molecular Diagnostics and High-Throughput Strategies
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-2004-4_14 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-2003-7, 978-1-4939-2004-4
|
Authors |
Hurtado A, Ana Hurtado, Hurtado, Ana |
Editors |
Mónica V. Cunha, João Inácio |
Abstract |
Reverse line blot (RLB) hybridization has become a well-established and widely used method for the multiplex identification of several Babesia and Theileria species in hosts and tick vectors. The procedure is based on the simultaneous PCR amplification of a polymorphic region of the 18S rRNA gene from different piroplasms followed by identification of the individual species by hybridization to species-specific oligonucleotide probes covalently linked to a nylon membrane in a macroarray format. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 17% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Librarian | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 33% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 8% |
Chemistry | 1 | 8% |
Engineering | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,388,295
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,871
of 13,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,290
of 260,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#65
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.