↓ Skip to main content

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Protocols

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Protocols'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Clinical, Epidemiologic, and Laboratory Aspects of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Case Studies.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Rapid methods for detection of MRSA in clinical specimens.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Immunofluorescence Microscopy for the Detection of Surface Antigens in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS)-PCR Identification of MRSA.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Typing of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) of Staphylococcus aureus
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec (SCCmec) Analysis of MRSA.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Genetic Interruption of Target Genes for Investigation of Virulence Factors
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Molecular Analysis of Staphylococcal Superantigens
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Investigation of Staphylococcus aureus Adhesion and Invasion of Host Cells
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Investigation of Biofilm Formation in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Transcriptomic Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus Using Microarray and Advanced Next-Generation RNA-seq Technologies.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Proteomic Approach to Investigate Pathogenicity and Metabolism of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Metabolomic Investigation of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Treatment of Infections Due to Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Anti-infective Drug Development for MRSA.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Animal Models in Drug Development for MRSA.
Attention for Chapter 16: Treatment of Infections Due to Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Treatment of Infections Due to Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Chapter number 16
Book title
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Protocols
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-664-1_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-663-4, 978-1-62703-664-1
Authors

Gregory M Anstead, Jose Cadena, Heta Javeri, Gregory M. Anstead, Anstead, Gregory M., Cadena, Jose, Javeri, Heta

Abstract

This chapter reviews data on the treatment of infections caused by drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, particularly methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). This review covers findings reported in the English language medical literature up to January of 2013. Despite the emergence of resistant and multidrug-resistant S. aureus, we have seven effective drugs in clinical use for which little resistance has been observed: vancomycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, linezolid, tigecycline, telavancin, ceftaroline, and daptomycin. However, vancomycin is less effective for infections with MRSA isolates that have a higher MIC within the susceptible range. Linezolid is probably the drug of choice for the treatment of complicated MRSA skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs); whether it is drug of choice in pneumonia remains debatable. Daptomycin has shown to be non-inferior to either vancomycin or β-lactams in the treatment of staphylococcal SSTIs, bacteremia, and right-sided endocarditis. Tigecycline was also non-inferior to comparator drugs in the treatment of SSTIs, but there is controversy about whether it is less effective than other therapeutic options in the treatment of more serious infections. Telavancin has been shown to be non-inferior to vancomycin in the treatment of SSTIs and pneumonia, but has greater nephrotoxicity. Ceftaroline is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against MRSA; it is non-inferior to vancomycin in the treatment of SSTIs. Clindamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, doxycycline, rifampin, moxifloxacin, and minocycline are oral anti-staphylococcal agents that may have utility in the treatment of SSTIs and osteomyelitis, but the clinical data for their efficacy is limited. There are also several drugs with broad-spectrum activity against Gm-positive organisms that have reached the phase II and III stages of clinical testing that will hopefully be approved for clinical use in the upcoming years: oritavancin, dalbavancin, omadacycline, tedizolid, delafloxacin, and JNJ-Q2. Thus, there are currently many effective drugs to treat resistant S. aureus infections and many promising agents in the pipeline. Nevertheless, S. aureus remains a formidable adversary, and despite our deep bullpen of potential therapies, there are still frequent treatment failures and unfortunate clinical outcomes. The following discussion summarizes the clinical challenges presented by MRSA, the clinical experience with our current anti-MRSA antibiotics, and the gaps in our knowledge on how to use these agents to most effectively combat MRSA infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 113 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 27 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 36 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,205,224
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,856
of 13,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,694
of 305,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#402
of 594 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,085 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 594 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.