↓ Skip to main content

Aquaporins

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 16: Aquaporin-Targeted Therapeutics: State-of-the-Field
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Aquaporin-Targeted Therapeutics: State-of-the-Field
Chapter number 16
Book title
Aquaporins
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-1057-0_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-241055-6, 978-9-40-241057-0
Authors

Lukmanee Tradtrantip Ph.D., Bjung-Ju Jin Ph.D., Xiaoming Yao M.D., Marc O. Anderson Ph.D., Alan S. Verkman M.D., Ph.D., Lukmanee Tradtrantip, Bjung-Ju Jin, Xiaoming Yao, Marc O. Anderson, Alan S. Verkman, Tradtrantip, Lukmanee, Jin, Bjung-Ju, Yao, Xiaoming, Anderson, Marc O., Verkman, Alan S.

Editors

Baoxue Yang

Abstract

Drugs targeting aquaporins have broad potential clinical applications, including cancer, obesity, edema, glaucoma, skin diseases and others. The astrocyte water channel aquaporin-4 is a particularly compelling target because of its role of brain water movement, neuroexcitation and glia scarring, and because it is the target of pathogenic autoantibodies in the neuroinflammatory demyelinating disease neuromyelitis optica . There has been considerable interest in the identification of small molecule inhibitors of aquaporins, with various candidates emerging from testing of known ion transport inhibitors, as well as compound screening and computational chemistry. However, in general, the activity of reported aquaporin inhibitors has not been confirmed on retesting, which may be due to technical problems in water transport assays used in the original identification studies, and the challenges in modulating the activity of small, compact, pore-containing membrane proteins. We review here the state of the field of aquaporin-modulating small molecules and biologics, and the challenges and opportunities in moving forward.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Student > Master 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,448,846
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,514
of 4,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,081
of 310,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#31
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.